0.05/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 960 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 120 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:02:21 EDT 2022 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.42 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.16/0.42 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 120s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh4l with 120s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 120s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # new_ho_10 with pid 27302 completed with status 0 0.16/0.43 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied 0.16/0.43 # Search class: HUUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 361s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 61s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_2 with 61s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_9 with 56s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # new_bool_1 with pid 27311 completed with status 0 0.16/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_1 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied 0.16/0.43 # Search class: HUUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_ho_10 with 361s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 61s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.16/0.43 0.16/0.43 # Proof found! 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Theorem 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.16/0.43 thf(decl_22, type, cP: a > a > a). 0.16/0.43 thf(decl_23, type, cE: a). 0.16/0.43 thf(decl_24, type, cJ: a > a). 0.16/0.43 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: a). 0.16/0.43 thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: a). 0.16/0.43 thf(cTHM20_pme, conjecture, (((![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X1)=(cE)))&![X2:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X2)=(X2))))&![X2:a, X1:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X2 @ X1) @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ (cP @ X1 @ X3)))))=>![X4:a, X5:a]:(?[X6:a]:(((cP @ X4 @ X6)=(X5))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM20_pme)). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X1)=(cE)))&![X2:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X2)=(X2))))&![X2:a, X1:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X2 @ X1) @ X3)=(cP @ X2 @ (cP @ X1 @ X3)))))=>![X4:a, X5:a]:(?[X6:a]:(((cP @ X4 @ X6)=(X5)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM20_pme])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:a, X16:a, X17:a, X18:a, X19:a, X22:a]:((((((cP @ (cJ @ X15) @ X15)=(cE))&((cP @ cE @ X16)=(X16)))&((cP @ (cP @ X17 @ X18) @ X19)=(cP @ X17 @ (cP @ X18 @ X19))))&((cP @ esk1_0 @ X22)!=(esk2_0)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a, X3:a]:(((cP @ (cP @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)=(cP @ X1 @ (cP @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X1)=(cE))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ cE @ X1)=(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ (cP @ X1 @ X2))=(X2))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_5])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ (cJ @ X1)) @ cE)=(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_4])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ (cJ @ (cJ @ (cJ @ X1))) @ X1)=(cE))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cJ @ (cJ @ X1))=(X1))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_8]), c_0_7])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a]:(((cP @ esk1_0 @ X1)!=(esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a, X2:a]:(((cP @ X1 @ (cP @ (cJ @ X1) @ X2))=(X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_9])). 0.16/0.43 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])]), ['proof']). 0.16/0.43 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 8 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 21 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 20 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 4 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 51 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 50 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 1 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 12 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 6 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 8 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 4 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 722 0.16/0.43 0.16/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.002 s 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages 0.16/0.43 0.16/0.43 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.011 s 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.006 s 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.017 s 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages 0.16/0.43 EOF